Apart from the fact that, as long as she has covered her nipples and pubic hair, she would not have been considered as "naked" but rather sexy, no matter how daring... quite unlike what was deemed "acceptable" just four or five decades ago, when walking along the streets wearing just a skimpy tube top and daisy-dukes would have been considered indecent public nudity.
Sandra G is always a delight to see, being naked in public should be considered totally acceptable but not compulsory for those who don't want to do it. What is all the fuss about? Some of us may feel more comfortable (and prettier) when covered up, but why do we have to wear what we don't want to?
it takes no guts to do that,just take advantage of the libertine laws of some countries and contribute to the general demoralizing of society
ReplyDeleteHow does walking naked contribute to the general demoralizing of society?
ReplyDeleteApart from the fact that, as long as she has covered her nipples and pubic hair, she would not have been considered as "naked" but rather sexy, no matter how daring... quite unlike what was deemed "acceptable" just four or five decades ago, when walking along the streets wearing just a skimpy tube top and daisy-dukes would have been considered indecent public nudity.
DeleteCarles.-
Sandra G is always a delight to see, being naked in public should be considered totally acceptable but not compulsory for those who don't want to do it. What is all the fuss about? Some of us may feel more comfortable (and prettier) when covered up, but why do we have to wear what we don't want to?
ReplyDelete